Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 1990American Journal of Epidemiology

The Accuracy and Precision of the Accutracker Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does the Accutracker ambulatory blood pressure monitor provide accurate and precise blood pressure measurements compared to manual observers in ambulatory subjects?

Population

120 ambulatory subjects at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

Comparison

Accutracker ambulatory blood pressure monitor vs Manual blood pressure measurement by observers

Design

Cross-sectional, Order of measurements determined at random, Independently…

Authors

Lawrence J. Appel
Lawrence J. AppelGeneral / Preventive / Lipids
Paul K. Whelton
Paul K. WheltonGeneral / Preventive / Lipids
ASAlexander SeidlerTechnische Universität Dresden

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Accutracker may suffice for most ambulatory monitoring; leaves open validation needs at high pressures and in older adults.

Key Points

  • To assess the accuracy and precision of the Accutracker ambulatory blood pressure monitor compared to standard manual auscultatory measurements.
  • Obtained five serial resting blood pressure measurements in N=120 ambulatory subjects at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions in 1987.
  • Assigned measurement order at random across two Accutrackers and two manual observers, with the fourth observer taking a replicate measurement.
  • Evaluated measurement differences, precision, and associations with patient characteristics using pairwise comparisons, scatter plots, and bivariate and multivariate regression analyses.
  • Mean differences between Accutracker and manual measurements were less than 3 mmHg for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure across all pairwise comparisons.
  • Both Accutrackers systematically underestimated high systolic and diastolic blood pressures, with increased age significantly associated with greater systolic underestimation in multivariate analyses.
  • Precision did not differ significantly among the two automated devices and two manual observers.

Structured PICO

Does the Accutracker ambulatory blood pressure monitor provide accurate and precise blood pressure measurements compared to manual observers in ambulatory subjects?

P
Population
120 ambulatory subjects at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
I
Intervention
Accutracker ambulatory blood pressure monitor
C
Comparator
Manual blood pressure measurement by observers
O
Outcome
Accuracy and precision of blood pressure measurements (mean difference between Accutracker and manual measurements)surrogate

The Accutracker ambulatory blood pressure monitor provides generally accurate and precise measurements, but tends to underestimate blood pressure at higher levels and in older patients.

Cite This Study

Appel et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71d48e75498292b70b2b8ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115664
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accutracker II (version 30/23) ambulatory blood pressure monitor1993 · 42 citations
  2. 2Clinical evaluation of the Accutracker II ambulatory blood pressure monitor: assessment of performance in two countries and comparison with sphygmomanometry and intra-arterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise1989 · 76 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of a New Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (Accutracker 102): Laboratory Comparisons With Direct Arterial Pressure, Stethoscopic Auscultatory Pressure, and Readings From a Similar Monitor (Spacelabs Model 5200)1988 · 56 citations
  4. 4Accuracy of ambulatory blood pressure monitors2013 · 45 citations
  5. 5Accuracy and analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data1992 · 10 citations