Key result
Mitral isthmus ablation using a steerable sheath achieved bidirectional block more frequently than a nonsteerable sheath in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (97.5% vs 77.5%, P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does the use of a steerable sheath improve the achievement of bidirectional block during mitral isthmus ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=80)
randomized
Does the use of a steerable sheath improve the achievement of bidirectional block during mitral isthmus ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 97.5% vs 77.5%
p-value: p=0.02
The use of a steerable sheath during mitral isthmus ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation significantly improves the achievement of bidirectional block and reduces the need for epicardial ablation.
Steerable sheaths merit consideration for mitral isthmus ablation in persistent AF; provides RCT evidence supporting preferential use to optimize linear lesions.
BACKGROUND: Although mitral isthmus (MI) ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients has been shown to be an effective ablative strategy, the establishment of the bidirectional conduction block of the MI is technically challenging. We investigated the usefulness of a steerable sheath for MI ablation in patients with persistent AF and its impact on the clinical outcome of persistent AF ablation. METHODS: A total of 80 consecutive patients undergoing MI ablation were randomized to 1 of the following 2 groups: group S (using a steerable long sheath) or group NS (using a nonsteerable long sheath). MI ablation was performed by using an open-irrigated ablation catheter with the guidance of a 3-dimensional mapping system. The endpoint of the MI ablation was the achievement of a bidirectional block. RESULTS: Bidirectional block through the MI was achieved in 87.5% (70/80) of patients with 14.0 ± 6.7 minutes of radiofrequency application. The bidirectional block was more frequently achieved in patients in group S compared to group NS (97.5% (39/40) vs 77.5% (31/40), P = 0.02). Additionally, epicardial ablation within the coronary sinus was less frequently required in group S compared to group NS (12.5% (5/40) vs 72.5% (29/40), P < 0.0001). Atrial tachycardia after the procedure more frequently occurred in the patients in whom MI block had not been achieved during the initial procedure (40.0% (4/10) vs 10.0% (7/70), P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The MI block could be achieved in the majority of patients by using a steerable sheath. An incomplete MI block increased the risk of AT following persistent AF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuo et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=80). Steerable long sheath vs. Nonsteerable long sheath was evaluated on Achievement of a bidirectional block (p=0.02). Mitral isthmus ablation using a steerable sheath achieved bidirectional block more frequently than a nonsteerable sheath in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (97.5% vs 77.5%, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: