Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 1997American Journal of Perinatology

Preeclampsia and Preterm Birth Subtypes in Nova Scotia, 1986 to 1992

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CACande V. AnanthRutgers, The State University of New JerseyDSDavid A. SavitzRutgers, The State University of New JerseyELE.R. LutherUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Longitudinal study reveals preeclampsia markedly increases medically indicated preterm delivery risk in pregnant women, highlighting the need to evaluate specific preterm birth subtypes.

Key Points

  • To determine whether the association between mild and severe preeclampsia and preterm delivery varies across subtypes defined by gestational age and precipitating clinical pathways.
  • Conducted a population-based longitudinal study using the Nova Scotia Atlee perinatal database from 1986 to 1992, examining 59,851 women across 78,086 singleton live births.
  • Categorized preterm births by gestational age—very preterm (<33 weeks) and moderately preterm (33–36 weeks)—and by precipitating event: membrane rupture, medical intervention, or spontaneous labor onset.
  • Estimated relative risks using multivariable logistic regression based on generalized estimating equations to adjust for confounding factors.
  • Mild and severe preeclampsia complicated 8.7% and 1.7% of singleton pregnancies, respectively.
  • Severe preeclampsia dramatically heightened the risk of medically indicated very preterm birth (RR = 80.8, 95% CI: 54.2–120.6) and moderately preterm birth (RR = 41.8, 95% CI: 34.0–51.4), whereas mild preeclampsia conferred lower risks (RR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1–4.0 and RR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.7–2.9, respectively).
  • Preeclampsia was associated with an elevated risk of moderately preterm birth via spontaneous labor (RR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3–2.8), but not very preterm birth via spontaneous labor (RR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.7–1.2) or membrane rupture.

Cite This Study

Ananth et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71dfa235aa2c282ce2f9b6https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-994090
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Incident Coronary Heart Disease After Preeclampsia: Role of Reduced Fetal Growth, Preterm Delivery, and Parity2017 · 110 citations
  2. 2Preeclampsia and Long-term Risk of Maternal Retinal Disorders2016 · 38 citations
  3. 3Variation in risk factors and timing of birth for different types of preterm birth: A historical cohort study2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Differences in neonatal outcomes between normal and preeclampsia complicated pregnancies2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Maternal Morbidity Associated With Early-Onset and Late-Onset Preeclampsia2014 · 310 citations