Key result
Genetic approaches and genome-wide scans are identifying novel biological pathways contributing to sudden cardiac death risk, which may offer utility for risk stratification in high-risk individuals.
Genetic approaches are yielding important insights into the pathogenesis of sudden cardiac death, which may eventually impact clinical risk stratification and management.
May support genetic risk stratification in high-risk SCD patients; leaves open clinical integration pending prospective validation.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD), a sudden pulseless condition due to cardiac arrhythmia, remains a major public health problem despite recent progress in the treatment and prevention of overall coronary heart disease. In this review, we examine the evidence for genetic susceptibility to SCD in order to provide biological insight into the pathogenesis of this devastating disease and to explore the potential for genetics to impact clinical management of SCD risk. Both candidate gene approaches and unbiased genome-wide scans have identified novel biological pathways contributing to SCD risk. Although risk stratification in the general population remains an elusive goal, several studies point to the potential utility of these common genetic variants in high-risk individuals. Finally, we highlight novel methodological approaches to deciphering the molecular mechanisms involved in arrhythmogenesis. Although further epidemiological and clinical applications research is needed, it is increasingly clear that genetic approaches are yielding important insights into SCD that may impact the public health burden imposed by SCD and its associated outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arking et al. (2012) conducted a review in Sudden cardiac death. Genetic variants was evaluated. Genetic approaches and genome-wide scans are identifying novel biological pathways contributing to sudden cardiac death risk, which may offer utility for risk stratification in high-risk individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: