Key result
Using 6-mm source-detector separation channels for fNIRS regression yielded a significantly higher contrast-to-noise ratio compared to 13-mm channels.
Why the study?
Does a 6-mm source-detector separation improve contrast-to-noise ratio compared to 13-mm in fNIRS of human cerebral hemodynamics in adults?
Does a 6-mm source-detector separation improve contrast-to-noise ratio compared to 13-mm in fNIRS of human cerebral hemodynamics in adults?
Shorter source-detector separations (6 mm) improve the regression of superficial hemodynamics in fNIRS signals from the adult brain compared to 13 mm.
Favors 6-mm channels for adult fNIRS regression; extends methodological evidence but leaves standardization open.
In functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) of human cerebral hemodynamics, dedicated surface-sensitive recording channels are useful for regressing out background hemodynamics and isolating activation-specific responses. A wide variety of source-detector separations have been utilized for this purpose. Here, we report a direct comparison of regression performance between two extremes of the reported range, 13 and 6 mm. Measurements of visual stimulation response (flickering radial checkerboard) were obtained from nine adults using a standard commercial source-detector grid with 13-mm diagonals, into which three extra detector fibers were placed to provide 6-mm channels at certain locations. When the NIRS recordings (17 total trials) were processed, the contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher with 6-mm regression channels than with 13 mm. The advantage could be due in part to the undesired sensing of brain activity by the 13-mm channels. We suggest that shorter distances be considered for optimal removal of superficial hemodynamics in NIRS signals from the adult brain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodwin et al. (2014) studied Healthy adults (visual stimulation response) (n=9). 6-mm source-detector separation channels vs. 13-mm source-detector separation channels was evaluated on Contrast-to-noise ratio. Using 6-mm source-detector separation channels for fNIRS regression yielded a significantly higher contrast-to-noise ratio compared to 13-mm channels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: