The Vroom-Yetton contingency model of leadership behavior is described and critiqued. While there is some evidence for the validity of the model, the use of concurrent validation with self-report data seriously questions this validity. The model is of limited utility because it deals with only one aspect of leader behavior and is not as parsimonious as alternative models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard Field (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: