Why the study?
Do newer oral anticoagulants prevent stroke compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Do newer oral anticoagulants prevent stroke compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
This review summarizes the pivotal trials of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports NOAC use over warfarin in non-valvular AF; leaves open optimal agent selection in diverse populations.
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) face an increased risk of stroke compared with those in normal sinus rhythm. The vitamin K antagonist warfarin, available for over half a century, is highly effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with AF, but it is a difficult drug to use properly. As a result, it is challenging to keep the anticoagulant effect of warfarin in the desired range. Newer oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that directly inhibit Factor IIa (thrombin) or Factor Xa provide reliable anticoagulation when administer in fixed oral doses without routine coagulation monitoring. This manuscript will review in detail the pivotal trials of these NOACs that led to their approval as well as comment on the factors that should influence their selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halperin et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: