Why the study?
Cerebrovascular hemodynamic mechanisms underlying cognitive decline secondary to non-stroke CVD remain unclear, and standard neuropsychological tests lack sensitivity for subclinical cognitive changes.
Does non-stroke cardiovascular disease alter attention-related event-related potentials (N2 and P3) and are these alterations associated with cerebrovascular hemodynamics?
Does non-stroke cardiovascular disease alter attention-related event-related potentials (N2 and P3) and are these alterations associated with cerebrovascular hemodynamics?
Reduced N2 amplitude may serve as an objective indicator of subclinical cognitive and attentional alterations in non-stroke CVD, which appear to be linked to cerebrovascular hemodynamic disturbances.
May enhance detection of subclinical cognitive changes in CVD; leaves open hemodynamic mechanisms.
Evidence suggests that cerebrovascular hemodynamic disturbances underlie cognitive deterioration secondary to cardiovascular disease (CVD), including manifestations other than stroke, but the mechanisms remain unclear. To date, the majority of studies have used neuropsychological measures validated for the detection of clinically significant cognitive decline but lack the sensitivity to accurately detect subclinical or subtle cognitive changes. The N2 and P3 components of the event-related potential are sensitive markers of attention and cognitive processing, and are valuable in the assessment of age-related cognitive changes and neurodegenerative disease. The aims of this study were to test (a) the sensitivity of N2 and P3 components in differentiating older adults with CVD from healthy controls, and (b) whether cerebrovascular hemodynamics are associated with alterations in attention in persons with non-stroke CVD. Older adults with CVD (n = 20) and healthy older adults (n = 20) without cognitive impairment or history of stroke and matched for age, were recruited. Cerebral blood flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery (MCAv) and Gosling's Pulsatility Index (PI) were assessed using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD). ERPs were elicited using a two-tone auditory oddball task. N2 amplitude was significantly reduced in the CVD group at midline frontal, central and parietal sites (p < .05, d > 0.6). No significant group differences were observed in N2 latency, P3 amplitude, or P3 latency. Further, MCAv and PI were strongly associated with N2 amplitude in the CVD group, such that greater MCAv was associated with reductions in N2 amplitude (b = -0.58, p = .018), whilst PI was associated with increases in N2 amplitude (b = 0.66, p = .006). No relationships between MCAv or PI with N2 or P3 ERP components were observed in the healthy control group. The data reported here suggest that a reduction in N2 amplitude may be an important objective indicator of subclinical cognitive and attentional alterations in non-stroke CVD, and support the notion that cerebrovascular hemodynamic disturbances play a role in the pathogenesis of cognitive deterioration secondary to non-stroke CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefanidis et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: