Why the study?
Predicting sudden cardiac death to determine the need for ICDs in HCM is difficult, and the role of deformation indices is less addressed.
Do 3D speckle tracking echocardiographic strain parameters correlate with sudden cardiac death risk markers in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Do 3D speckle tracking echocardiographic strain parameters correlate with sudden cardiac death risk markers in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
3D speckle tracking echocardiographic strain parameters are significantly reduced in HCM patients and correlate with conventional sudden cardiac death risk markers, suggesting potential utility for risk stratification.
3D strain parameters associate with SCD risk markers in HCM; leaves open incremental value for ICD decisions in prospective studies.
CONTEXT: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) predictability for assessing the need for primary insertion of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) in patients with Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is difficult though there are several conventional risk markers. The role of deformation indices in predicting SCD in HCM is less addressed. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the 3D speckle tracking echocardiographic strain parameters of HCM patients and its relation with SCD risk markers. DESIGN AND STUDY METHODOLOGY: It was a cross-sectional observation study done over a period of one year with a follow up period of one year. Fifty HCM patients were included after screening eighty-two patients. Their global LV strain parameters, Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), Global Circumferential Strain (GCS), Global Radial Strain (GRS) and Global area strain (GAS) were analysed with respect to their age and gender-matched controls. The various strain parameters were correlated with the conventional SCD risk markers and the ESC SCD risk score among these HCM patients. RESULTS: All the global strain parameters were significantly low in HCM patients compared to their controls {GLS -7.30 ± 3.424 vs -18.78 ± 2.342, p < 001; GCS -11.26 ± 2.754 vs -25.08 ± 3.542, p < 001; GRS 20.56 ± 8.929 vs 39.70 ± 7.546, p < 001}. On subgroup analysis of HCM patients with LV thickness >30 mm, abnormal exercise test, family history of SCD, LVOT gradients >30mmHgand more than one SCD risk marker had significantly low values for all global deformation parameters, when compared with their control HCM cohort. The ESC risk score also had significant inverse correlation with all deformation parameters (GLS 0.496, p < 0.001; GCS 0.491, p < 0.001; GRS -0.529, p < 0.001; GAS 0.519, p < 0.001). On follow up, only one event was recorded in this cohort. CONCLUSION: There exists a possible linear correlation between conventional SCD risk markers and 3D deformation parameters, which may be utilized for risk stratification and SCD predictability in HCM patients after confirmation with further large prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakesh et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: