Why the study?
Maintenance of cerebral blood flow during orthostasis is impaired with aging and linked to cognitive decline, but the effect of the APOE4 allele remains unknown.
Does APOE4 carrier status alter cerebral vascular regulation during orthostasis across Alzheimer's disease progression in older adults?
Does APOE4 carrier status alter cerebral vascular regulation during orthostasis across Alzheimer's disease progression in older adults?
APOE4 carriers exhibit distinct, potentially compensatory cerebral and peripheral vascular responses to orthostasis when cognitively normal, which are lost as Alzheimer's disease progresses.
APOE4 carriers show altered MCAv responses to orthostasis; leaves open whether this accelerates cognitive decline in at-risk older adults.
INTRODUCTION Maintenance of cerebral blood flow during orthostasis is impaired with aging and associated with cognitive decline, but the effect of Apolipoprotein L4-allele ( APOE4 ) is unknown. METHODS Older adults (n=108) ( APOE4 carriers, n=47; noncarriers, n=61) diagnosed as cognitively-normal (NC), MCI, or AD participated. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv), assessed using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound, and beat-to-beat mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were continuously recorded during a sit-to-stand transition. Anticipatory and orthostatic-induced MCAv and MAP responses were compared between genotypes and across disease progression. RESULTS Cognitively-normal APOE4 carriers showed greater anticipatory MCAv increase, greater MCAv decrease with orthostasis, and shorter latency of peripheral MAP responses to orthostasis compared to noncarriers. MCAv and MAP responses were delayed and attenuated across the APOE4 disease progression, with no differences between genotypes in MCI and AD. DISCUSSION APOE4 carriers and noncarriers present with distinct phenotypes of cerebral vascular dysfunction during hemodynamic orthostatic challenge. Unique cerebral and peripheral vascular compensation observed in APOE4 carriers may be lost as AD progresses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palmer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: