Why the study?
What are the normal values for SNRT and SACT in children, and can they reliably identify sinus node dysfunction?
What are the normal values for SNRT and SACT in children, and can they reliably identify sinus node dysfunction?
This study defines normal sinoatrial conduction parameters in children and demonstrates that while abnormal electrophysiologic data confirms sinus node dysfunction, normal values do not exclude it.
Pediatric SNRT/SACT norms defined; normal values do not exclude SND and require prospective validation.
Sinus node recovery time (SNRT) and sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) were determined in each of 28 children. Eighteen children (ages 2 to 14 years) had electrocardiographically normal sinus node function and served as controls. Ten children (ages 4 to 13 years) had electrocardiographic evidence of sinus node dysfunction, consisting of inappropriate sinus bradycardia, periods of sinus arrest or sinoatrial exit block. Mean control SNRT was 133% of the sinus cycle length with an upper normal limit of 151% (mean + 2 SD). Control SACTs ranged from 45‐105 ms with mean and mean + 2 SD values of 71 ms und 105 ms. In the patients with SND, SNRTs averaged 168% and five patients had abnormally prolonged values of 158 to 256%. Mean SACT was 101 ms with four children having values greater than 105 ms. Seven of the 10 patients with SND had at least one electrophysiologic abnormality. This study defines normal sinoatrial conduction in children and validates the data by demonstrating a close correlation with similar data obtained from adult populations. Although abnormal electrophysiologic data confirms the presence of sinus node dysfunction, normal values for SNRT and SACT do not insure normal sinus node function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven M. Yabek (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: