Why the study?
The influence of genetic polymorphisms on the development of gestational hypertension is unclear.
Are single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the NR3C2 gene associated with the risk of gestational hypertension in Han Chinese women?
Are single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the NR3C2 gene associated with the risk of gestational hypertension in Han Chinese women?
Polymorphisms at the rs5522, rs2070951, and rs5534 loci of the NR3C2 gene are significantly associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension in Han Chinese women.
NR3C2 SNPs may aid GH risk stratification in Han Chinese women; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: The influence of genetic polymorphisms on the development of gestational hypertension (GH) is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine whether single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 2 (NR3C2) genes, rs5522, rs2070951, rs5534, s2248038, and s9992256 are associated with GH in Han Chinese women. METHOD: Sanger sequencing was used to analyze the genotypes of rs5522, rs2070951, rs5534, rs2248038, and rs9992256 loci of the NR3C2 gene in 450 patients with GH and 450 healthy controls. RESULTS: The rs5522 dominant model (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.47, P < .001) and the recessive model (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.33-1.86, P < .001) had higher GH risk. The rs2070951 dominant model (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03-1.35, P = .02) had higher risk of GH, and the recessive model (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.84-1.34, P = .55) was not significant for GH risk. The rs5534 dominant model (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.43, P = .001) had a higher GH risk. The rs2248038 and rs9992256 sites were not significantly related to GH risk. Gene-gene interactions at the rs5522, rs2070951, and rs5534 loci affected GH risk (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.64, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The SNPs of the NR3C2 gene rs5522, rs2070951, and rs5534 are associated with GH in Han Chinese women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: