Why the study?
Does CABG without CPB reduce the frequency of microembolic signals and neurologic complications compared to CABG with CPB in patients eligible for routine CABG?
Does CABG without CPB reduce the frequency of microembolic signals and neurologic complications compared to CABG with CPB in patients eligible for routine CABG?
While CABG without CPB reduces the frequency of microembolic signals compared to conventional CABG, this reduction does not appear to translate into early postoperative neurologic clinical differences in a small cohort.
Off-pump CABG lowers MES without early neurologic benefit; challenges the assumption that MES reduction alone improves outcomes.
Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may potentially reduce the number of microembolic signals (MES) associated with aortic manipulation or generated by the pump circuit, resulting in a better neurologic outcome after surgery. Our aim was to compare the frequency of MES and neurologic complications in CABG with and without CPB. Twenty patients eligible to routine CABG without CPB were randomized to surgery with CPB and without CPB and continuously monitored by transcranial Doppler. Neurologic examination was performed in all patients before and after surgery. The two groups were similar with respect to demographics, risk factors, grade of aortic atheromatous disease and number of grafts. The frequency of MES in the nonCPB group was considerably lower than in CPB patients, however, we did not observe any change in the neurologic examination during the early postoperative period. Neurologic complications after CABG may be related to the size and composition of MES rather than to their absolute numbers. A large prospective multicentric randomized trial may help to elucidate this complex issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malheiros et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: