Why the study?
Few studies have analyzed gender-related outcome differences in critically ill patients, and prior results have been inconsistent.
Does female gender improve 1-year mortality in critically ill adult patients?
Does female gender improve 1-year mortality in critically ill adult patients?
Gender is not independently associated with long-term survival in critically ill patients, supporting consistent treatment regardless of sex.
No gender difference in 1-year ICU mortality; leaves open whether sex influences outcomes in other cohorts or settings.
PURPOSE: Few studies analyzed gender-related outcome differences of critically ill patients and found inconsistent results. This study aimed to test the independent association of gender and long-term survival of ICU patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FROG-ICU was a prospective, observational, multi-center cohort designed to investigate the long-term mortality of critically ill adult patients. The primary endpoint of this study was 1-year mortality after ICU admission of women compared to men. RESULTS: The study included 2087 patients, 726 women and 1361 men. Women and men had similar baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and disease severity. No significant difference in 1-year mortality was found between women and men (34.9% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.18). After multivariable adjustment, no difference in the hazard of death was observed [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.77-1.28)]. Similar 1-year survival between women and men was found in a propensity score-matched patient cohort of 506 patients [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.54-1.14)]. CONCLUSION: Women constituted one-third of the population of critically ill patients and were unexpectedly similar to men regarding demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and disease severity and had similar risk of death at 1 year after ICU admission. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01367093; registered on June 6, 2011.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollinger et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: