Key result
Hypertensive emergencies demand rapid organ-damage assessment and tailored IV antihypertensives.
Why the study?
Hypertensive crises in critically ill patients present a frequent and challenging clinical situation requiring clear differentiation and management strategies for hypertensive urgency versus emergency.
This review provides a comprehensive clinical framework for the immediate assessment and etiology-directed pharmacological management of hypertensive emergencies in critically ill patients.
Reinforces individualized IV therapy for hypertensive emergencies; extends guideline synthesis for ICU settings but leaves open need for prospective validation.
Hypertensive crises encompass a spectrum of clinical presentations ranging from severe asymptomatic blood pressure (BP) elevation to life-threatening hypertensive emergencies and represent a frequent and challenging situation in the critically ill. While hypertensive urgency, defined as a marked elevation in blood pressure without acute organ damage, can generally be managed in the outpatient setting, hypertensive emergencies require immediate in-hospital management. Hypertensive emergencies are defined by a BP ≥180/110 mmHg associated with acute target-organ damage. Malignant hypertension represents a distinct and severe subset, further characterized by microvascular complications including hypertensive retinopathy and fibrinoid necrosis affecting multiple organs. Initial evaluation is critical to decipher between hypertensive urgency and emergency, with a systematic screening for end-organ damage: cardiovascular system (heart, aorta, and large vessels), central nervous system, retina, and kidneys. The acuity of BP rise, rather than its absolute level alone, largely determines the risk of organ injury, underscoring the importance of a thorough clinical and paraclinical assessment. Once a hypertensive emergency is identified, prompt initiation of intravenous antihypertensive therapy is mandatory. Drug selection, target BP, and the rate of BP reduction must be individualized according to the specific type of end-organ damage. In this narrative review, we summarize current definitions and epidemiology of hypertensive emergencies, detail the clinical approach to initial assessment, and provide an etiology-based overview of management strategies with a focus on intravenous antihypertensive agents and BP targets. Finally, we emphasize the importance of structured long-term follow-up after the acute phase, including etiological workup and optimization of antihypertensive therapy, to prevent recurrence and target-organ failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demiselle et al. (2026) conducted a review in Hypertensive emergencies. Intravenous antihypertensive therapy was evaluated. Hypertensive emergencies require prompt assessment of acute end-organ damage and individualized intravenous antihypertensive therapy tailored to the specific type of organ injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: