This review highlights the complexities of clinical presentation and management of hypertensive emergencies, emphasizing the need for appropriate and efficacious management to avoid target organ injury.
Urges prompt recognition and treatment of hypertensive emergencies to minimize organ damage; leaves open optimal protocols pending prospective trials.
It has been estimated that approximately 600,000 to 800,000 Americans will develop a hypertensive crisis (Calhoun and Oparil, 1990). Although such numbers represent only about 1% of the estimated 60 million Americans with hypertension, hypertensive crisis often constitutes a major medical emergency, necessitating a focused, assertive, and reasoned therapeutic intervention. When such patients are seen in the emergency department or in a physician's office with a critical elevation in blood pressure (BP), appropriate and efficacious management is essential to avoid catastrophic injury to vital target organs, including the central nervous system, the heart, and the kidneys. Delays in initiating effective therapy or, equally important, overzealous therapy leading to a too-rapid reduction in BP can produce severe complications involving these target organs. This article reviews the spectrum of clinical syndromes that comprise hypertensive emergencies, highlighting 2 to illustrate the complexities of clinical presentation and management. The newly advocated treatment guidelines based on the category of acute severe hypertension (including asymptomatic hypertensive urgencies) are also considered, as are therapeutic strategies utilizing currently available antihypertensive agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murray Epstein (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: