Why the study?
Does multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification detect SCN5A deletions missed by classic sequencing in a patient with Brugada syndrome?
Does multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification detect SCN5A deletions missed by classic sequencing in a patient with Brugada syndrome?
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification can detect large-scale rearrangements in the SCN5A gene causing Brugada syndrome that are missed by classic sequencing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MLPA may detect SCN5A deletions missed by sequencing in Brugada; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
A 14-year-old boy presented with atrial flutter. His ECG showed Brugada changes, first-degree AV block and major sinus pauses. Polymorphic VT was inducible at electrophysiology study. A pacemaker defibrillator was placed. Classic sequencing for SCN5A was normal. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, however, detected a major deletion in SCN5A. It is predicted that this deletion would result in haploinsufficiency. The report is the first description of a large-scale rearrangement of the SCN5A gene and supports the association between the molecular pathology and the phenotypic expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eastaugh et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: