Why the study?
Does quantitative endothelial biomicroscopy accurately estimate endothelial cell density compared to a specular microscope in patients?
Does quantitative endothelial biomicroscopy accurately estimate endothelial cell density compared to a specular microscope in patients?
Quantitative endothelial biomicroscopy is a rapid, inexpensive technique that accurately estimates endothelial cell density compared to specular microscopy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports quantitative endothelial biomicroscopy for endothelial cell density estimation; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Twenty patients were evaluated by quantitative endothelial biomicroscopy and the resulting endothelial cell densities compared with those from a specular microscope. Estimated cell densities by this technique, when compared with the specular microscope, demonstrated a Pearson correlation coefficient of +0.977, an average error of -7% and an absolute error of 12%. There were no errors greater than 26% except for one extremely low cell density of 318 cells/mm2 for which the estimate was 476 cells/mm2. This rapid, inexpensive technique requires counting the number of endothelial cells seen across the horizontal diameter of the 0.2-mm projected spot beam of a standard biomicroscope. From this count and the known spot size the endothelial cell density may be accurately calculated. A simplified four-step technique for performing specular microscopy using only the standard biomicroscope and a method for accurately measuring the size of the projected slit lamp spot beam are explained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holladay et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: