Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate whether neonatal outcomes differ between general anesthesia and regional anesthesia when induction of anesthesia to delivery time is prolonged (≥10 minutes).
Does general anesthesia compared to regional anesthesia improve neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies with prolonged induction to delivery time?
Does general anesthesia compared to regional anesthesia improve neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies with prolonged induction to delivery time?
Even with prolonged induction of anesthesia to delivery time (≥10 minutes), favorable neonatal outcomes are seen with both general and regional anesthesia without significant differences between the two modalities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reassures on neonatal safety with either approach when IADT is prolonged; leaves open causality and needs prospective trials before practice change.
Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference in neonatal outcomes with general anesthesia (GA) versus regional anesthesia (RA) when induction of anesthesia to delivery time (IADT) is prolonged (≥10 minutes). Study Design This is a retrospective case–control study that included cases from July 2014 until August 2020. We reviewed all singleton pregnancies delivered between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation with IADT ≥ 10 minutes. Urgent deliveries, those who received RA for labor pain management or started cesarean delivery under RA and converted to GA, as well as cases with fetal anomalies, were excluded. The propensity score (PS) matching method was performed using age, ethnicity/race, body mass index, gestational age at delivery, preexisting maternal comorbidities, and pregnancy complications. Analyses were performed with SAS software version 9.4. Results During the study period, we identified 258 cases meeting inclusion criteria. After the PS matching was applied, the study sample was reduced to 60 cases in each group. The median IADT and uterine incision to delivery time were similar between groups (41.5 [30.5, 52] vs. 46 minutes [38, 53.5], p = 0.2 and 1.5 [1, 3] vs. 2 minutes [1, 3], respectively). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to arterial or venous cord pH (7.24 [7.21, 7.26] vs. 7.23 [7.2, 7.27], p = 0.7 and 7.29 [7.26, 7.33] vs. 7.3 [7.26, 7.33], p = 0.4, respectively). Nor were there any associations between maternal characteristics and Apgar's score at 5 minutes, except for Apgar's score at 1 minute (p < 0.001). No significant difference was identified in the rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU; 11 [52.4%] vs. 10 [47.6%], p = 0.8) or NICU length of stay between GA and RA (4 [3, 14] vs. 4.5 [3, 11], p = 0.9). Conclusion Our data indicate that even with prolonged IADT, favorable neonatal outcomes are seen with both GA and RA, in contrast with previous studies performed decades ago.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cojocaru et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: