Why the study?
Although socioeconomic status is known to affect cardiovascular outcomes, little is known about whether longitudinal changes in wealth are associated with cardiovascular health status.
Does wealth mobility affect the risk of cardiovascular events or death in adults over 50 years of age?
Does wealth mobility affect the risk of cardiovascular events or death in adults over 50 years of age?
Upward wealth mobility in late middle age is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events or death after 65 years of age, highlighting the impact of socioeconomic trajectories on cardiovascular health.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform CV risk stratification in older adults; leaves open whether wealth interventions alter outcomes.
Importance: The association of socioeconomic status and cardiovascular outcomes has been well described, but little is known about whether longitudinal changes in wealth are associated with cardiovascular health status. Objective: To evaluate the association between midlife wealth mobility and risk of cardiovascular events. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study included US adults 50 years or older who participated in the Health and Retirement Study. Participants in the primary analysis had no history of cardiovascular disease and had observations in at least two of three 5-year age intervals (50-54, 55-59, and 60-64 years) and follow-up after 65 years of age. Data were collected from January 1, 1992, to December 31, 2016, and analyzed from November 10, 2020, to April 26, 2021. Exposures: Quintiles of wealth (reflecting total nonhousing assets) were defined within each of 4 birth cohorts (1931-1935, 1936-1940, 1941-1945, and 1946-1950). Wealth mobility was defined as an increase or a decrease of 1 or more wealth quintiles and was compared with wealth stability (same quintile over time) using covariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Main Outcomes and Measures: Composite outcome of nonfatal cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, or stroke) or cardiovascular death. Results: A total of 5579 participants were included in the primary analysis (mean [SD] age, 54.2 [2.6] years; 3078 women [55.2%]). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 16.9 (5.8) years, 1336 participants (24.0%) experienced a primary end point of nonfatal cardiovascular event or cardiovascular death (14.4 [95% CI, 13.6-15.2] per 1000 patient-years). Higher initial wealth (per quintile) was associated with lower cardiovascular risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per quintile, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.84-0.95]; P = .001). When compared with stable wealth, participants who experienced upward wealth mobility (by at least 1 quintile) had independently lower hazards of a subsequent nonfatal cardiovascular event or cardiovascular death (aHR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.73-0.97]; P = .02), and participants who experienced downward wealth mobility had higher risks (aHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.00-1.32]; P = .046). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that upward wealth mobility relative to peers in late middle age is associated with lower risks of cardiovascular events or death after 65 years of age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machado et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: