This study investigates the hydrodynamic performance of three- and four-fin surfboard configurations using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD)/CFX approach. CFD models of three- and four-fin configurations were setup inside a rectangular domain using CFX meshing. Comparisons of performance were evaluated by analysing both lift and drag coefficients for each fin system as a function of the angle of incidence at various speeds. The two-equation k-ॉ turbulence model was used as the base for simulations of flow velocities of 3, 5, 7 and 10 m/s. In addition the seven-equation Reynolds stress (RSM) turbulence model was also employed for flow velocities of 10 and 25 m/s in order to compare the predictions of the k-ॉ turbulence model. Results demonstrated that the maximum lift for the three-fin configuration occurred at a smaller angle of incidence than for the four-fin design. However, the magnitude of maximum lift was the same for both designs under the operating conditions considered in this study. These results imply that if a surfer desires a greater degree of manoeuvrability (ideal in regular surfing), then the three-fin configuration would be more appropriate in comparison to the four-fin configuration. This is because the three-fin design is more efficient at generating lift during smaller angles of attack compared to the four-fin design. However, if stability and speed in the surfboard is preferred (favourable in big wave surfing), then the four-fin configuration would be more suitable owing to less lift and drag at smaller incidence angles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gudimetla et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: