This review outlines the specific indications for permanent pacing in bradyarrhythmias, emphasizing the necessity of symptoms or hemodynamic compromise for most conduction abnormalities.
Supports restricting asymptomatic pacing to Mobitz II or infra-Hisian complete block; leaves open prospective validation in other conduction disorders.
Indications for permanent pacing in the bradyarrhythmias are summarized. In the absence of symptoms, pacing is justified only when Mobitz type II block or complete atrioventricular (AV) block is localized in the bundlebranch system. All other abnormalities of impulse generation or conduction (incomplete AV block of any type, atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response, or sinus node dysfunction) must be shown to be stable and intrinsic and to cause CNS symptoms or hemodynamic compromise to justify pacing. Isolated intra-Hisian abnormality without failure of AV conduction is benign. Measurement of HV interval does not contribute significant information. Correlation of carotid sinus sensitivity with carotid sinus syncope is poor (5%). Bradyarrhythmia produced by minimal effective doses of an essential drug is a rare indication for pacing and requires special documentation. Inadequate indications, sources of error, and misconceptions are discussed. Generally, it is important to exclude drug effect, transient clinical states, and correctable systemic disease as causes of the abnormality before making a conclusion about pacing. (JAMA1984;252:1307-1311)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brendan Phibbs (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: