Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The contributions of homeostatis mechanisms to spontaneous drinking were assessed in a study of residual oral drinking under several conditions of exogenous water administration. Continuous and/or discontinuous infusiors were conducted for long periods with dry food present ad libitum. The routes of administration were intravenous (IV), intragastric (IG) through a nasopharyngeal catheter. All infusions reduced from noninfused levels, but the magnitude of that reduction was a function of both route and temporal characteristics. Continuous infusions were more effective via the IG route than IV, and a residual intake of about 10 ml/24 h presisted at even the highest infusion rates. Discontinuous meal-paired IV infusions suppressed mid- and postmeal drinking, consistent with the satisfaction of systemic needs induced by cry food intake. Meal-paired IG nasopharyngeal infusions competely suppressed drinking when the infusions exceeded base-line intake by only about 20%. In marked contrast, corresponding IG infusions through a direct fistula catheter were relatively ineffective. In all cases the decreases in drinking were not of a nonspecific nature beacuse food intake was unchanged. The discussion considers the different levels of metering involved and the time-varying (derivative) nature of the infusion if was suggested that there is a nonhomeostatic contribution to normal drinking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowland et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: