Why the study?
Recurrences remain common after catheter ablation for drug-refractory MMVTs, and the safety and efficacy of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) are still under evaluation.
Does stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) safely and effectively suppress recurrent MMVT in a patient with advanced HFrEF, CRT-D, and a CCM device?
Does stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) safely and effectively suppress recurrent MMVT in a patient with advanced HFrEF, CRT-D, and a CCM device?
A 25 Gy single-session STAR successfully and safely suppressed recurrent MMVT over 2 years in a highly complex patient with HFrEF, CRT-D, and a CCM device.
Introduction: Catheter ablation (CA) is the current standard of care for patients suffering drug-refractory monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (MMVTs). Yet, despite significant technological improvements, recurrences remain common, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is increasingly being adopted to overcome the limitations of conventional CA, but its safety and efficacy are still under evaluation. Case presentation: We hereby present the case of a 73-year-old patient implanted with a mitral valve prosthesis, a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator, and a cardiac contractility modulation device, who was successfully treated with STAR for recurrent drug and CA-resistant MMVT in the setting of advanced heart failure and a giant left atrium. We report a 2-year follow-up and a detailed dosimetric analysis. Conclusion: Our case report supports the early as well as the long-term efficacy of 25 Gy single-session STAR. Despite the concomitant severe heart failure, with an overall heart minus planned target volume mean dosage below 5 Gy, no major detrimental cardiac side effects were detected. To the best of our knowledge, our dosimetric analysis is the most accurate reported so far in the setting of STAR, particularly for what concerns cardiac substructures and coronary arteries. A shared dosimetric planning among centers performing STAR will be crucial in the next future to fully disclose its safety profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levis et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: