Why the study?
Do baseline ACEI/ARB use, lower LVEDV, and >98% biventricular pacing improve the likelihood of super-response in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Population
201 patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) between 2010 and 2014
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
Identified predictors of CRT super-response may refine candidate selection; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Do baseline ACEI/ARB use, lower LVEDV, and >98% biventricular pacing improve the likelihood of super-response in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Lower baseline left ventricular end-diastolic volume, use of ACEI/ARB, and >98% biventricular pacing are independent predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 6 months.
Jin et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: