Key result
CRT-D hypo-response is linked to ~5.2-fold higher risk of HF or death vs super-response.
Why the study?
Few data exist on predictors of super-response to CRT-D and associated morbidity and mortality in mildly symptomatic heart failure populations.
What baseline factors predict LVEF super-response to CRT-D, and does super-response translate into improved event-free survival in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure?
Cohort (n=752)
Yes
What baseline factors predict LVEF super-response to CRT-D, and does super-response translate into improved event-free survival in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 5.25 (95% CI 2.01–13.74)
Absolute Event Rate: 26% vs 4%
p-value: p=0.001
Specific baseline clinical and echocardiographic features predict an LVEF super-response to CRT-D in mildly symptomatic heart failure, which correlates strongly with a reduced risk of subsequent heart failure events or death.
OBJECTIVES The authors investigated predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) and whether super-response translated into improved event-free survival in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND Few data exist on predictors of super-response to CRT-D and associated morbidity and mortality in mildly symptomatic HF populations. METHODS Patients were assigned to CRT-D with paired echocardiograms at baseline and at 12 months (n = 752). Super-response was defined by the top quartile of LVEF change. Best-subset regression analysis identified predictors of LVEF super-response. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to investigate associations of response category with development of nonfatal HF event or all-cause death. RESULTS All 191 super-responders experienced an LVEF increase of ≥14.5% (mean LVEF increase 17.5 ± 2.7%). Six predictors were associated with LVEF super-response to CRT-D therapy: female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.96; p = 0.001), no prior myocardial infarction (OR: 1.80; p = 0.005), QRS duration ≥150 ms (OR: 1.79; p = 0.007), left bundle branch block (OR: 2.05; p = 0.006), body mass index <30 kg/m(2) (OR: 1.51; p = 0.035), and smaller baseline left atrial volume index (OR: 1.47; p < 0.001). Cumulative probability of HF or all-cause death at 2 years was 4% in super-responders, 11% in responders, and 26% in hypo-responders (log-rank p < 0.001 overall). In multivariate analysis, hyporesponse was associated with increased risk of HF or all-cause death, compared with super-response (hazard ratio: 5.25; 95% confidence interval: 2.01 to 13.74; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Six baseline factors predicted LVEF super-response in CRT-D-treated patients with mild HF. Super-response was associated with reduced risk of subsequent cardiac events. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT]; NCT00180271).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in mildly symptomatic heart failure (HF) (n=752). Hypo-response to CRT-D vs. Super-response to CRT-D was evaluated on Development of nonfatal HF event or all-cause death (HR 5.25, 95% CI 2.01-13.74, p=0.001). Hypo-response to CRT-D was associated with a significantly increased risk of heart failure or all-cause death compared with super-response (HR 5.25; 95% CI 2.01-13.74; p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: