Why the study?
Response to CRT varies significantly among patients, and identifying baseline characteristics that predict super-response and long-term prognosis is needed.
Does the combination of HF duration and left atrial dimension predict super-response and long-term prognosis in patients receiving CRT?
Cohort (n=73)
Does the combination of HF duration and left atrial dimension predict super-response and long-term prognosis in patients receiving CRT?
The combination of heart failure duration and left atrial dimension provides a robust prediction of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
LBBB may identify lower-risk CRT recipients; leaves open whether HF duration and left atrial dimension add independent value for super-response prediction.
BACKGROUND: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies significantly among patients. This study aimed to identify baseline characteristics that could predict super-response to CRT and to evaluate the long-term prognosis in super-responders. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 73 consecutive patients who received CRT. Patients were considered as super-responders after 6-month follow-up when NYHA class reduction to I or II combined with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% was observed. Patients were divided into super-responders group and non-super-responders group. All-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) was referred to the combined end point. RESULTS: 17 (23.3%) patients were super-responders. HF duration, left atrial dimension (LAD), and left bundle branch block (LBBB) were independent predictors of super-response to CRT. The combination of HF duration and LAD could provide more robust prediction of super-response than standalone HF duration (0.899 versus 0.789, Z = 2.207, P = 0.027) or standalone LAD (0.899 versus 0.775, Z = 2.487, P = 0.013). super-responders had excellent LV reverse remodeling. The cumulative incidences of combined end point were significantly lower in the super-responders group, LAD ≤ 42mm group, and combination of HF duration ≤ 48 months and LAD ≤ 42mm group. LBBB remained associated with a lowered risk of the combined end point (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07-0.57, P = 0.003), whereas LAD was associated with a raised risk of the combined end point (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.17, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: HF duration, LAD, and LBBB independently predicted super-response. The combination of HF duration and LAD makes more robust prediction of CRT super-response. Super-responders had excellent LV reverse remodeling and decreased the incidences of the combined end point. LBBB and LAD were independently associated with the combined end point.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=73). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left atrial dimension (LAD) vs. Absence of LBBB / different LAD was evaluated on All-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.57, p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: