This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The problem of selecting a subset of k populations π₁, ⋯, πₖ, which contains the "best" population, is considered. The unknown values θ₁, ⋯, θₖ are the characteristics associated with π₁, ⋯, πₖ and the unknown population associated with θₖ = maxᵢθᵢ is called the "best." It is assumed that, given θ = (θ₁, ⋯, θₖ) the pdf of the independent random variables X₁, ⋯, Xₖ belong to a monotone likelihood ratio family, the prior distribution of θ is exchangeable, and the loss function is a linear combination of two components, namely the subset size $|s|$ and the distance between the "best" and the "best" in the selected subset $s,$ i.e., L(θ, s) = c|s| + θₖ - maxj : πⱼ ∈ s θⱼ. It is shown that the Bayes rule depends on at most $(k - 1)$ computable expressions. Some lower and upper bounds on the differences of Bayes risks are given to help reduce the amount of computation for the Bayes rule. If Xᵢ has a normal distribution with mean θᵢ and known variance σ², then it is shown that (i) for $k = 2,$ the Bayes rule with vague prior knowledge and the classical rule are the same if the probability of correct selection, P^, is chosen as a suitable function of $c,$ and (ii) if c/σ 1/π¹/2, then the Bayes rule selects only one population and if .2821 c/σ < 1/π¹/2, then it selects at most two populations. The tables for implementing the Bayes rule for normal populations are also given.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goel et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: