A circulating plasma protein fraction (PreR-Co) activates renal prorenin but not plasma prorenin, suggesting a specific mechanism for renal active renin processing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests PreR-Co as renal-specific prorenin activator in rats; leaves open human relevance and therapeutic translation.
The aim of the present study was to purify and identify a plasma protein fraction (PreR-Co) involved in renal prorenin activation and to explore its capacity to process plasma prorenin. PreR-Co was obtained from plasma as a single electrophoretic band by (NH(4))(2)SO(4) precipitation, Sephacryl S-200 HR gel filtration, anti-rat albumin immunoaffinity, and ion-exchange chromatography. The amidase, esterase, and kallikrein activities of PreR-Co were studied, as was its N-terminal amino acid sequence. Rat kidney extract or plasma (normal or previously treated with acid to pH 2.8) were incubated with PreR-Co for 15 minutes at 37 degrees C. Renin concentration was measured by incubation with homologous angiotensinogen. The same protocol was repeated with samples activated by trypsin. The N-terminal amino acid sequence was IIGGSMDAKGSFP, which had a homology of 90% with the beta-chain of haptoglobin, 69% with serine-proteases, and 65% with kallikreins. The renin concentration in rat kidney extract was 34+/-4 ng of angiotensin I (Ang I). mg of tissue(-1). h(-1). After PreR-Co or trypsin treatments, renin concentrations were 211+/-7 and 110+/-11 ng of Ang I. mg of tissue(-1). h(-1), respectively. The plasma renin concentration in normal plasma was 67.6+/-13.3 ng of Ang I. mL(-1). h(-1), and no significant difference was observed after PreR-Co treatment. However, a significant increase (202.8+/-7.8 ng of Ang I. mL(-1). h(-1); P<0.01) was found after trypsin treatment. The isolated PreR-Co acts on renal prorenin but not on plasma prorenin. These results suggest that active renin is processed in the kidney by a circulating enzyme that may have a role in the regulation of circulating renin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vincent et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: