Why the study?
What are the recommended methods for screening and early diagnosis of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
What are the recommended methods for screening and early diagnosis of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
This review highlights myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and stress echocardiography as the preferred screening modalities for asymptomatic CAD in type 2 diabetes, while noting the growing role of newer non-invasive imaging techniques.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Screening asymptomatic T2DM patients for CAD may identify silent ischemia; leaves open optimal method and outcome impact.
Diabetes is a very frequent disease and it is estimated that its prevalence will continuously increase during the next two decades. The arteriosclerotic process in diabetic patients progresses earlier and more diffusely, and it is more accelerated in the diabetic patient than in the overall population. In diabetic subjects, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke are the leading causes of death, but the presence of arterial disease is not always detected before the development of the acute arterial event. Several times, AMI is asymptomatic or present nonspecific symptoms, and it is the initial form of presentation of coronary artery disease causing an important delay in initiating cardiovascular treatment in these patients. The purpose of this review article is to discuss how to screen and early diagnose the presence of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic diabetic patients, based on new available diagnostic resources. Currently, the most recommended technique used for screening coronary artery disease in these patients is myocardial perfusion scintigraphy or stress echocardiography because of greater sensitivity and specificity in relation to the exercise test. However, technological advances have enabled the development of new imaging diagnostic methods that are less invasive than conventional coronary angiography, and which gradually gain importance in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease as they show higher effectiveness with lower invasiveness and risk. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60(2):143-51.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tavares et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: