Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: There are no prior studies that assess the non-in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy rates in chlamydia serology-positive versus serology-negative women. Therefore, we wanted to determine whether a positive Chlamydia trachomatis immunoglobulin G serology result predicts reduced clinical pregnancy rates without IVF. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed at a university-affiliated reproductive center. A total of 1279 new infertility patients seen at the Continuum Reproductive Center between January 2007 and June 2009 underwent C. trachomatis immunoglobulin G screening. Charts were later reviewed for hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, treatment cycles, and ultrasound evidence of an intrauterine pregnancy. The main outcome measure was non-IVF cumulative pregnancy rates. RESULTS: Seventy (5.5%) of 1279 of the participants were found to have a positive chlamydia serology result. Serology-positive participants had significantly more tubal block on hysterosalpingography (37.5% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.001) and laparoscopically confirmed tubal damage (85.7% vs. 48.9%, P = 0.002). The percent of all participants who achieved an ultrasound documented clinical pregnancy, at our center, without IVF was significantly lower among Chlamydia-positive participants (10.0% versus 21.7%) in seronegative participants (P < 0.02). The hazard rate of non-IVF clinical pregnancy among chlamydia antibody testing-positive patients was 57% less than the rate of pregnancy among chlamydia antibody testing-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.92). Both the per-cycle and the cumulative IVF pregnancy rates were equivalent in seropositive and in seronegative participants. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large study to report that a positive serology screening result is both predictive of tubal damage and a reduced cumulative pregnancy rate when excluding treatment with IVF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keltz et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: