Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Guided by the Tripartite Influence Model, we aimed to re-evaluate the factorial structure, reliability, and convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of the existing Turkish version of the SATAQ-4R in a community sample of 385 women aged 18-65 years (M = 26.33, SD = 10.05). Confirmatory factor analysis using the Diagonally Weighted Least Squares (DWLS) estimator supported the original seven-factor model with good fit (χ²(413) = 1086, p < .001, CMIN/df = 2.63, CFI = .996, TLI = .995, RMSEA = .070, 90% CI [.067, .076], SRMR = .070). All subscales demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency (α and ω ranging from .82 to .96) and satisfactory two-week test-retest reliability (r = .70-.96). Convergent validity was supported by theoretically consistent positive associations with measures of disordered eating (r = .23-.63), appearance comparisons (r = .21-.61), and cosmetic surgery acceptance (r = .15-.44), and significant negative associations with body appreciation (r = -.24 to -.55). Discriminant validity was supported by Heterotrait-Monotrait ratios (.15-.83), all below the .85 threshold, confirming seven empirically distinct subscales. Measurement invariance testing supported configural, full metric, and scalar invariance across younger (18-25 years) and older (26-65 years) age groups. Criterion validity was supported by significant differences in Significant Others Pressure scores across Body Mass Index (BMI) groups, with women in higher BMI categories reporting greater appearance-related pressure. These findings indicate that the Turkish SATAQ-4R is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing sociocultural appearance pressures and internalization in adult Turkish women, supporting its use in research and clinical contexts in Türkiye.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahsa Rouhi Maleki (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: