Why the study?
Abnormal blood flow patterns may persist after coarctation of the aorta repair and negatively affect left ventricular performance, prompting investigation into their relationship using 4D flow CMR.
Does abnormal aortic flow assessed by 4D flow CMR correlate with left ventricular mass and volume in patients with coarctation of the aorta?
Does abnormal aortic flow assessed by 4D flow CMR correlate with left ventricular mass and volume in patients with coarctation of the aorta?
4D flow CMR demonstrates that abnormal aortic hemodynamics, such as increased velocity angle and pulse wave velocity, correlate with altered left ventricular mass and volume in patients with coarctation of the aorta.
Background After successful repair for coarctation of the aorta (CoA) abnormal blood flow patterns can be present, which may have a negative impact on left ventricular (LV) performance. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between aortic haemodynamics assessed by four-dimensional flow (4D flow) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and LV performance in CoA patients. Methods CoA patients with a clinical indication for CMR underwent additional 4D flow acquisition. Wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, vorticity, viscous dissipation, energy loss, kinetic energy and velocity angle were assessed for several aortic segments at peak-systole. Global pulse wave velocity (PWV) was assessed for the entire aorta. Results In total, 17 CoA patients were included. Increased velocity angle in the ascending aorta was correlated with decreased LV mass (p=0.0445). Energy loss at the CoA site and increased degree of vorticity in the descending aorta were correlated with increased LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume (p=0.0499, p=0.0461, respectively). Aortic PWV was correlated with LV mass and LV end-systolic volume (p=0.0385, p=0.0397, respectively). Conclusion Adverse aortic-ventricular interaction in CoA patients was demonstrated by abnormal aortic haemodynamics by 4D flow assessment which were associated impaired LV performance. 4D flow CMR may provide novel parameters to assess aortic-ventricular interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warmerdam et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: