Why the study?
Does simulation-based teaching improve the ability to identify basic transoesophageal echocardiography views compared to theatre-based teaching in echocardiography-naïve subjects?
Does simulation-based teaching improve the ability to identify basic transoesophageal echocardiography views compared to theatre-based teaching in echocardiography-naïve subjects?
Simulation-based teaching is superior to point-of-care theatre-based teaching for improving the ability of echocardiography-naïve subjects to identify basic transoesophageal echocardiography views.
Supports simulation-based over theatre-based TEE training for novices; extends RCT evidence for simulation in echocardiography education.
In recent years, the use of transoesophageal echocardiography has increased in anaesthesia and intensive care. We explored the impact of two different teaching methods on the ability of echocardiography-naïve subjects to identify cardiac anatomy associated with the 20 standard transoesophageal echocardiography imaging planes, and assessed trainees' satisfaction with these methods of training. Fifty-two subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a simulation-based and a theatre-based teaching group. Subjects undertook video-based tests comprised of 20 multiple choice questions on echocardiography views before and after receiving echocardiography teaching. Subjects in simulation- and theatre-based teaching groups scored 40% (30-40 [20-50])% and 35% (30-40 [15-55])% in the pre-test, respectively (p = 0.52). Following echocardiography teaching, subjects within both groups improved upon their pre-test knowledge (p < 0.001). Subjects in the simulation-based teaching group significantly outperformed their theatre-based group counterparts in the post-intervention test (p = 0.0002).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogilvie et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: