Why the study?
Does QRS prolongation influence the prognostic value of T wave alternans in patients with coronary artery disease and LVEF <= 40%?
Does QRS prolongation influence the prognostic value of T wave alternans in patients with coronary artery disease and LVEF <= 40%?
T wave alternans is a useful predictor of arrhythmic events and death only in patients with coronary artery disease and LVEF <= 40% who have a normal QRS duration (<120 msec).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TWA may not predict events with QRS prolongation; leaves open whether QRS duration modifies TWA utility for risk stratification in low-LVEF CAD.
INTRODUCTION: T wave alternans (TWA) is a promising new noninvasive marker of arrhythmia vulnerability that quantifies beat-to-beat changes in ventricular repolarization. Secondary repolarization abnormalities are common in subjects with wide QRS complexes. However, the relationship between TWA and QRS prolongation has not been evaluated. The goal of this study was to determine if QRS prolongation influences the prevalence or prognostic value of TWA. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study consisted of 108 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% who were referred for electrophysiologic studies. Patients underwent TWA testing using bicycle ergometry in the absence of beta-blockers or antiarrhythmic drugs. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. The prognostic value of TWA was assessed in the entire cohort and in two subgroups: QRS < 120 msec (normal, n = 62) and QRS > or = 120 msec (prolonged, n = 46). TWA (hazard ratio 2.2, P = 0.03) and QRS prolongation (hazard ratio 2.2, P = 0.01) were both significant and independent predictors of arrhythmic events. QRS prolongation had no effect on the prevalence of positive TWA tests (QRS < 120 msec: 48%, QRS > or = 120 msec: 50%, P = NS). TWA was a highly significant predictor of events in patients with a normal QRS (hazard ratio 5.8, P = 0.02). In contrast, TWA was not useful for risk stratification in subjects with QRS prolongation (hazard ratio 1.1, P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: TWA is useful only for risk stratification in the absence of QRS prolongation. The presence of QRS prolongation and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% may be sufficient evidence of an adverse prognosis that additional risk stratification is not useful or necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rashba et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: