This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This contribution describes the synthesis and ring‐opening (co)polymerization of several L ‐lysine N ‐carboxyanhydrides (NCAs) that contain labile protective groups at the ϵ‐NH 2 position. Four of the following L ‐lysine NCAs were investigated: N ϵ ‐trifluoroacetyl‐ L ‐lysine N ‐carboxyanhydride, N ϵ ‐( tert ‐butoxycarbonyl)‐ L ‐lysine N ‐carboxyanhydride, N ϵ ‐(9‐fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl)‐ L ‐lysine N ‐carboxyanhydride, and N ϵ ‐(6‐nitroveratryloxycarbonyl)‐ L ‐lysine N ‐carboxyanhydride. In contrast to the harsh conditions that are required for acidolysis of benzyl carbamate moieties, which are usually used to protect the ϵ‐NH 2 position of L ‐lysine during NCA polymerization, the protective groups of the L ‐lysine NCAs presented here can be removed under mildly acidic or basic conditions or by photolysis. As a consequence, these monomers may allow access to novel peptide hybrid materials that cannot be prepared from ϵ‐benzyloxycarbonyl‐ L ‐lysine N ‐carboxyanhydride (Z‐Lys NCA) because of side reactions that accompany the removal of the Z groups. By copolymerization of these L ‐lysine NCAs with labile protective groups, either with each other or with γ‐benzyl‐ L ‐glutamate N ‐carboxyanhydride or Z‐Lys NCA, orthogonally side‐chain‐protected copolypeptides with number‐average degrees of polymerization ≤20 were obtained. Such copolypeptides, which contain different side‐chain protective groups that can be removed independently, are interesting for the synthesis of complex polypeptide architectures or can be used as scaffolds for the preparation of synthetic antigens or protein mimetics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez‐Hernández et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: