Why the study?
Does female gender affect 6-month mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does female gender affect 6-month mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Female gender is not independently associated with increased 6-month mortality in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock undergoing PCI, indicating both genders derive similar benefits from early revascularization.
No independent mortality risk by sex after PCI in AMI shock; supports similar outcomes but leaves open prospective validation.
This study sought to determine the impact of female gender on clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) due to predominant ventricular failure undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyzed gender-related differences in procedural, angiographic, and clinical outcomes in 208 consecutive patients with AMI complicated by CS. Out of 208 patients with CS, 65 were women and 143 men. Women were older than men (74 +/- 10 years vs. 66 +/- 12 years; P < 0.001) and had a greater incidence of a history of hypertension (43% vs. 29%; P = 0.041). The 6-month mortality rate was 42% in women and 31% in men (P = 0.157). There were no differences between groups in reinfarction rate and target vessel revascularization rate. Multivariate analysis showed age as the only variable independently related to the 6-month mortality, while female gender was not related to the risk of death. The benefit of early PCI is similar in women and men, and any potential referral bias in the use of PCI based on gender differences should be avoided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antoniucci et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: