Why the study?
Does Shenmai injection added to conventional treatment improve clinical and physiological outcomes in patients with chronic cor pulmonale heart failure?
Does Shenmai injection added to conventional treatment improve clinical and physiological outcomes in patients with chronic cor pulmonale heart failure?
Shenmai injection as an adjuvant to conventional therapy may improve symptoms and physiological parameters in chronic cor pulmonale heart failure, but current evidence is too weak to support its routine use.
May support adjunctive Shenmai use in chronic cor pulmonale HF; reinforces pooled RCT evidence for efficacy and safety.
BACKGROUND: Shenmai injection (SM), as a traditional Chinese medicine injection, is widely used for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure in mainland China. It is essential to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of SM as an adjuvant treatment for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure. METHODS: Eight English and Chinese electronic databases were searched, from inception to December 2014, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SM for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.2. RESULTS: Twenty-seven RCTs with 2045 participants were identified. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. Only one trial reported data on death. None of the included trials reported quality of life. The meta-analysis indicated that compared to conventional treatment, the combination of SM and conventional treatment was more effective in terms of the New York Heart Association classification (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.20-1.32; P < 0.00001), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (MD, 11.33; 95% CI, 8.59-14.07; p < 0.00001), partial pressure of oxygen (MD, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.36; P < 0.00001) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (MD, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.58-1.08; p < 0.00001). In addition, two trials reported that SM plus conventional treatment was superior to the conventional treatment alone to reduce B-type natriuretic peptide. No serious adverse drug events or reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: SM plus conventional treatment appeared to be effective and relatively safe for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure. However, due to the generally low methodological quality and small sample size, this review didn't find evidence to support routine use of SM as an adjuvant treatment for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: