Why the study?
Does a rapid ultrafiltration rate increase the risk of pathological left atrial remodelling in incident patients on haemodialysis?
Does a rapid ultrafiltration rate increase the risk of pathological left atrial remodelling in incident patients on haemodialysis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher ultrafiltration rates in incident hemodialysis patients are associated with pathological left atrial remodeling, highlighting the need for optimal fluid management.
OBJECTIVE: Optimal fluid management is essential when caring for a patient on haemodialysis (HD). However, if the fluid removal is too rapid, the resultant higher ultrafiltration rate (UFR) disadvantageously promotes haemodynamic instability and cardiac injury. We evaluated the effects of a rapid UFR on changes in the echocardiographic left atrial volume index (LAVI) over a period of time. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 124 new patients on HD. INTERVENTIONS: /year) were calculated. The UFR was expressed in mL/hour/kg, and we used the mean UFR over 30 days (∼12-13 treatments). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 75th centile of the ΔLAVI/year distribution was regarded as a 'pathological' increment. RESULTS: /year. Correlation analysis showed that ΔLAVI/year was closely related to the baseline blood pressure, haemoglobin level, residual renal function and UFR. According to the receiver operating characteristics curve, the 'best' cut-off value of UFR for predicting the pathological increment was 10 mL/hour/kg, with an area under the curve of 0.712. In multivariate analysis, systolic blood pressure, a history of coronary artery disease, haemoglobin <10 g/dL and high UFR were significant predictors. An increase of 1 mL/hour/kg in the UFR was associated with a 22% higher risk of a worsening LAVI (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.41). CONCLUSIONS: An increased haemodynamic load could affect left atrial remodelling in incident patients on HD. Thus, close monitoring and optimal control of UFR are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: