Why the study?
Does amiodarone improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis after successful balloon mitral valvuloplasty?
Does amiodarone improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis after successful balloon mitral valvuloplasty?
Amiodarone significantly improves the maintenance of sinus rhythm following DC cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis post-BMV.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support amiodarone for short-term rhythm control post-BMV in RHD; leaves open confirmation in larger trials.
OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia in patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD). This study was conducted to determine the maintenance of sinus rhythm with amiodarone therapy following DC cardioversion (DCCV), early after successful balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV). METHODS: Patients were randomized to amiodarone group and placebo group and their baseline characteristics were recorded. DCCV was done 48h after BMV. After cardioversion, oral amiodarone was started initially 200mg three times a day for 2 weeks, then 200mg twice daily for two weeks followed by 200mg once daily for 12 months. Patients in placebo group received DCCV alone without preloading amiodarone. After DCCV, they were given placebo for 12 months. RESULTS: The 3 months follow-up period was completed by 77 patients (95%). Of them, 31 (77.5%) patients in amiodarone group and 14 (34.1%) in placebo group remained in sinus rhythm (SR). The 12 months follow-up period was completed by 73 patients (90.1%). Of them, 22 (55%) patients in amiodarone group and 7 (17.1%) in placebo group remained in SR. CONCLUSION: We conclude that amiodarone is more effective than placebo in maintenance of SR at the end of 3 months following successful cardioversion and more patients continued to remain in SR even at the end of 12 months without major serious adverse effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vilvanathan et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: