Why the study?
Does nifedipine or isosorbide dinitrate improve left ventricular function and reduce mitral regurgitation severity in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation?
Does nifedipine or isosorbide dinitrate improve left ventricular function and reduce mitral regurgitation severity in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nifedipine provides sustained reduction in mitral regurgitation and improvement in forward stroke volume after 14 days of therapy, whereas isosorbide dinitrate does not.
The acute effect and effect of 14 days' treatment with isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) and nifedipine (NIF) was evaluated by radionuclide cardiography in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation and sinus rhythm. 2. In 23 patients with clinically stable disease blood pressure was lowered by 15% and left ventricular volume was reduced by 16-20% after 20 mg sublingual ISDN causing combined pre- and afterload reduction. Afterload reduction alone induced by 10 mg NIF resulted in an acute 9% decrease in left ventricular endsystolic volume, whereas forward stroke volume increased by 30%, and regurgitation fraction tended to decrease. No haemodynamic effects could be detected after 14 days' treatment with 20 mg ISDN orally twice daily (preload reduction), whereas 20 mg NIF twice daily (afterload reduction) caused an increase in forward stroke volume (18%) and a decrease in both regurgitant volume (20%) and regurgitation fraction (22%) without affecting blood pressure or heart rate. 3. ISDN and NIF have beneficial acute haemodynamic effects in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation probably due to their pre- and afterload reducing properties. The reduction in regurgitation induced by NIF appears to be sustained after 14 days therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelbæk et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: