Why the study?
Does a single admission measurement of ultra-sensitive troponin I exclude acute myocardial infarction from other myocardial injury in patients presenting to the Emergency Department?
Does a single admission measurement of ultra-sensitive troponin I exclude acute myocardial infarction from other myocardial injury in patients presenting to the Emergency Department?
A single admission ultra-sensitive troponin I level has poor diagnostic capability to exclude AMI from other myocardial injury, and adding myoglobin does not improve performance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single TnI-Ultra at admission has limited rule-out value for AMI versus injury; hypothesis-generating case report warrants validation in larger ED cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Third generation troponin assays should aid in the rule-out of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The study aim was to assess the capability of admission measurement of ultra-sensitive troponin I (TnI-Ultra) to exclude AMI from other myocardial injury. METHODS: The first TnI-Ultra sample from 856 patients at presentation to the Emergency Department and subsequent admission to the Cardiac Care Unit were considered in this case series. Myoglobin was simultaneously detected in 684 patients. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the first single TnI-Ultra level was 82.5% in overall AMI, and similar in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), admitted, respectively at 3 and 8 h from symptoms. The diagnostic capability of a first single TnI-Ultra level was poor for both STEMI and NSTEMI to discriminate and rule-out overall AMI from myocardial injury, with an area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.65 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.55. Adopting an optimal test threshold or adding myoglobin detection did not improve TnI-Ultra performances. CONCLUSIONS: The capability of a first single TnI-Ultra level to exclude AMI from other myocardial injury in early and late presenters is poor. Addition of myoglobin assay offered no further improvement and was not considered useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferraro et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: