Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A Met-hepatocyte growth factor receptor oncoprotein, Tpr-Met, generated by chromosomal rearrangement, fuses a protein dimerization motif with the cytoplasmic domain of the Met receptor, producing a cytosolic, constitutively activated tyrosine kinase. Although both the Met receptor and the Tpr-Met oncoprotein associate with the same substrates, activating mutations of the Met receptor in hereditary papillary renal carcinomas have different signaling requirements for transformation than Tpr-Met. This suggests differential activation of membrane-localized pathways by oncogenic forms of the membrane-bound Met receptor but not by the cytoplasmic Tpr-Met oncoprotein. To establish which pathways might be differentially regulated, we have localized the constitutively activated Tpr-Met oncoprotein to the membrane using the c-src myristoylation signal. Membrane localization enhances cellular transformation, focus formation, and anchorage-independent growth and induces tumors with a distinct myxoid phenotype. This correlates with the induction of hyaluronic acid (HA) and the presence of a distinct form of its receptor, CD44. A pharmacological inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3' kinase (PI3'K), inhibits the production of HA, and conversely, an activated, plasma membrane-targeted form of PI3'K is sufficient to enhance HA production. Furthermore, the multisubstrate adapter protein Gab-1, which couples the Met receptor with PI3'K, enhances Met receptor-dependent HA synthesis in a PI3'K-dependent manner. These results provide a positive link to a role for HA and CD44 in Met receptor-mediated oncogenesis and implicate PI3'K in these events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamikura et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: