Key result
Individual or group mirror therapy showed no significant effect on arm motor function compared to control after stroke, though individual therapy improved visuospatial neglect.
RCT (n=60)
Randomized into three groups
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of individual or group mirror therapy on sensorimotor function, activities of daily living, quality of life and visuospatial neglect in patients with a severe arm paresis after stroke. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centre. SUBJECT: Sixty patients with a severe paresis of the arm within three months after stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Three groups: (1) individual mirror therapy, (2) group mirror therapy and (3) control intervention with restricted view on the affected arm. MAIN MEASURES: Motor function on impairment (Fugl-Meyer Test) and activity level (Action Research Arm Test), independence in activities of daily living (Barthel Index), quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale) and visuospatial neglect (Star Cancellation Test). RESULTS: After five weeks, no significant group differences for motor function were found (P > 0.05). Pre-post differences for the Action Research Arm Test and Fugl-Meyer Test: individual mirror therapy: 3.4 (7.1) and 3.2 (3.8), group mirror therapy: 1.1 (3.1) and 5.1 (10.0) and control therapy: 2.8 (6.7) and 5.2 (8.7). However, a significant effect on visuospatial neglect for patients in the individual mirror therapy compared to control group could be shown (P < 0.01). Furthermore, it was possible to integrate a mirror therapy group intervention for severely affected patients after stroke. CONCLUSION: This study showed no effect on sensorimotor function of the arm, activities of daily living and quality of life of mirror therapy compared to a control intervention after stroke. However, a positive effect on visuospatial neglect was indicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thieme et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Severe arm paresis after stroke (n=60). Individual or group mirror therapy vs. Control intervention with restricted view on the affected arm was evaluated on Motor function on impairment (Fugl-Meyer Test) and activity level (Action Research Arm Test) (p=>0.05). Individual or group mirror therapy showed no significant effect on arm motor function compared to control after stroke, though individual therapy improved visuospatial neglect.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: