Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess implications of applying "Race-neutral" GLI-Global spirometry prediction for workers in occupational medicine (OM). METHODS: We applied GLI-Global to 24 hypothetical male subjects (most industrial workers have been male for decades.) We examined the following: 1) four reference/prediction equations; 2) four racial groups; and 3) 80%, 100%, and 120% of race-specific predicted forced vital capacity (FVC). RESULTS: The effect of changing to GLI-Global varied by group: White > Northeast (NE) Asian > Southeast (SE) Asian > Black. GLI-Global predicted values are midway between Blacks' and Whites,' and among those with lower lung function (80% predicted FVC), Blacks and SE Asians show declining %predicted values and Z-scores and increasing FVCs<LLN, while Whites and NE Asians show increasing % predicted and Z-scores and decreasing FVCs<LLN. CONCLUSIONS: OM clinicians and policymakers must carefully consider the implications of changing prediction equations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Townsend et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: