Why the study?
Do sdLDL-C concentrations and the sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio associate with the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque?
Do sdLDL-C concentrations and the sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio associate with the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque?
Elevated sdLDL-C and sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio are strongly associated with carotid atherosclerotic plaque and may serve as useful diagnostic biomarkers, even in individuals with low LDL-C levels.
sdLDL-C may mark carotid plaque; leaves open incremental value over LDL-C in prospective validation.
Objective To explore the association between carotid artery plaque and small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) concentrations as well as the probability of sdLDL-C and sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio as biomarkers of human carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Methods 174 subjects in physical examination center of An Zhen Hospital from November 2015 to February 2016 were enrolled one by one as a cross-sectional study. All subjects were divided into carotid IMT abnormal group (n=92) and control group(n=82)according to carotid ultrasound. According to the thickness of IMT characterized by carotid ultrasound, subjects were divided into the thickened IMT group(n=32), plaques group(n=60), and plaques group were divided into single plaque group(n=33) and multiple plaques group(n=27). Body Mass Index(BMI), fasting serum sdLDL-C, triglyceride(TG), LDL-C and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations were measured. Pearson′s and Spearman correlation coefficient analyses and logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relationships between carotid atherosclerotic plaque, sdLDL-C values, and other clinical variables. Area under curve(AUC) was calculated to determine the diagnostic value of sdLDL-C and sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio in subjects with carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Results Levels of sdLDL-C(1.02±0.42 vs. 0.97±0.46 vs. 0.61±0.29, F=21.07, P<0.001) and sdLDL-C /LDL-C(0.34±0.17 vs. 0.34±0.17 vs. 0.21±0.09, F=16.34, P<0.001) in the thickened IMT group and the plaques group were higher than those of the control group). Even in individuals considered to be at low LDL-C (<2.59 mmol/L) level, sdLDL-C(0.94±0.41 vs. 0.56±0.25, t=4.00, P<0.01) and sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio(0.43±0.19 vs. 0.24±0.08, t=4.45, P<0.01) remained higher in the carotid abnormal group than those in the control group. Age and sdLDL-C were the independent risk factors of carotid artery plaque. AUC of receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) for serum sdLDL-C and sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio were 0.882(95% CI: 0.819-0.945, P<0.01) and 0.830(95% CI: 0.747-0.914, P<0.01) to determine the multiple carotid atherosclerotic plaque, and the cut-off level were 0.90 mmol/L (sensitivity, 88.0%; specificity, 79.3%) and 0.30 (sensitivity, 84.0%; specificity, 74.5%). Conclusions Carotid atherosclerotic plaque has a close relationship with sdLDL-C concentrations. sdLDL-C and sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio can be biomarkers when assessing subjects with a carotid atherosclerotic plaque.(Chin J Lab Med, 2018, 41: 219-226)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: