Why the study?
Left atrial thrombosis is usually detected by TEE, prompting the development of non-invasive clinical and echocardiographic scores to predict it in AF patients undergoing early electrical cardioversion.
Can clinical and echocardiographic scores predict left atrial thrombosis in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing early electrical cardioversion?
Can clinical and echocardiographic scores predict left atrial thrombosis in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing early electrical cardioversion?
A combination of clinical and echocardiographic scores can accurately predict left atrial thrombosis in patients with persistent AF, potentially reducing the need for transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid non-invasive LAT prediction before ECV in AF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
AIMS: Left atrial thrombosis (LAT) is usually detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The aim of the present study was to identify clinical and echocardiographic factors associated with left atrial thrombosis in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing early electrical cardioversion (ECV) in order to create scores that can predict LAT, in a non-invasive way. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients with persistent AF scheduled for ECV was evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography and TEE. By a logistic regression model, variables significantly associated with LAT were assessed and introduced in predictive models to develop both a clinical and an echocardiographic prediction score for the presence of LAT. Among echocardiographic parameters, E/e' ratio was directly associated with LAT (OR = 2.25), while an inverse correlation was detected with left ventricular ejection fraction (OR = 0.43) and total global left atrial strain (OR = 0.59). Two prediction scores (clinical and echocardiographic) were developed. The positive predictive values of the clinical and the echocardiographic score were 80% and 100%, respectively, while the negative predictive values were 98% and 94%, respectively. Combined use of the scores reached a positive and negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: When providing concordant information the two scores are able to correctly identify patients with or without LAT. An external validation is necessary to demonstrate their usefulness in the clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vincenti et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: