Why the study?
Do radial artery conduits improve angiographic graft patency compared to saphenous vein conduits in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Population
Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel disease requiring additional grafts
Comparison
Radial artery conduits vs Saphenous vein conduits
Design
Meta-analysis
Follow-up
up to >5 years (stratified as ≤1 year, 1-5 years, >5 years)
Authors
Loading...
Supports radial artery preference over saphenous vein in CABG; confirms meta-analytic superiority for long-term patency.
Do radial artery conduits improve angiographic graft patency compared to saphenous vein conduits in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Radial artery conduits offer superior medium- and long-term angiographic patency compared to saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery.
Athanasiou et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: