Why the study?
Stereotactic body radiotherapy has emerged as a promising alternative for refractory VT in structural heart disease, but its safety and efficacy in patients ineligible for catheter ablation require evaluation.
Does stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) reduce VT burden and prove safe in patients with structural heart disease and intractable VT who are ineligible for catheter ablation?
Does stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) reduce VT burden and prove safe in patients with structural heart disease and intractable VT who are ineligible for catheter ablation?
The STRA-MI-VT study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single 25 Gy fraction of stereotactic body radiotherapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia in patients ineligible for catheter ablation.
SBRT shows preliminary safety and VT reduction in refractory structural heart disease; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening condition, which usually implies the need of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in combination with antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) represents a common form of therapy in oncology, which has emerged as a well-tolerated and promising alternative option for the treatment of refractory VT in patients with structural heart disease. OBJECTIVE: In the STRA-MI-VT trial, we will investigate as primary endpoints safety and efficacy of SBRT for the treatment of recurrent VT in patients not eligible for catheter ablation. Secondary aim will be to evaluate SBRT effects on global mortality, changes in heart function, and in the quality of life during follow-up. METHODS: This is a spontaneous, prospective, experimental (phase Ib/II), open-label study (NCT04066517); 15 patients with structural heart disease and intractable VT will be enrolled within a 2-year period. Advanced multimodal cardiac imaging preceding chest CT-simulation will serve to elaborate the treatment plan on different linear accelerators with target and organs-at-risk definition. SBRT will consist in a single radioablation session of 25 Gy. Follow-up will last up to 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: We test the hypothesis that SBRT reduces the VT burden in a safe and effective way, leading to an improvement in quality of life and survival. If the results will be favorable, radioablation will turn into a potential alternative option for selected patients with an indication to VT ablation, based on the opportunity to treat ventricular arrhythmogenic substrates in a convenient and less-invasive manner.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carbucicchio et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: