Registry analysis reveals audit standard adherence and cardiovascular risk in paediatric renal replacement therapy, highlighting targets for long-term growth and vascular health.
BACKGROUND: The Paediatric Registry analyses renal replacement therapy (RRT) data in children. All 13 UK paediatric nephrology centres submit electronic data. AIMS: To provide centre specific data and to determine adherence to relevant audit standards. METHODS: Data analysis to calculate summary statistics and achievement of an audit standard. RESULTS: The median height z-score for children on dialysis was -2.0 and for children with a functioning transplant -1.3. Children transplanted before age 11 years improved their height z score subsequently, whereas those >11 maintained their height z-score, with all transplanted patients having a similar height z-score after 3 years of starting RRT.The median weight z-score for children on dialysis was -1.2, and for children with a functioning transplant -0.2.Of those with data, 75% of the prevalent paediatric RRT population had .1 risk factors for cardiovascular disease, with 1 in 10 having all three risk factors evaluated. For transplant patients, 76% achieved the systolic blood pressure (SBP)standard and 91% achieved the haemoglobin standard. For haemodialysis patients, 53% achieved the SBP standard,66% the haemoglobin standard, 84% the calcium standard,43% the phosphate standard and 43% achieved the parathyroid hormone (PTH) standard. For peritoneal dialysis patients, 61% achieved the SBP standard, 83% the haemoglobin standard, 71% the calcium standard, 56% the phosphate standard and 36% achieved the PTH standard. CONCLUSIONS: Quarterly data collection will improve quality and reporting. Continued focus on improving height and avoiding obesity is needed. Awareness and management of cardiovascular risk is an important long term strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamilton et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from The Nephron journals/Nephron journals